Legal Opinion
Gould v. Deschutes County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 24, 2010No. 2008203, A143430PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
This petition and cross-petition for judicial review arise from a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) decision that remanded Deschutes County’s approval of the final master plan (FMP) for development of a destination resort by Thornburgh Resort Company, LLC (Thornburgh). The issues on review concern Thornburgh’s fish and wildlife mitigation plans. Petitioner Gould argues that LUBA remanded too little to the county. On a cross-petition, Thornburgh contends that LUBA remanded too much. We affirm on the petition and the cross-petition.
This is but the latest appeal of several regarding Thornburgh’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Citizens for Responsibility v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Gage v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Meyer v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Sellwood-Moreland Improvement League v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Lennar Northwest, Inc. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs v. Deschutes Cty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.