Legal Opinion
Seal-Flex, Inc. v. Athletic Track and Court Construction, Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 24, 1996No. 95-1083, 95-1160PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN. Separate opinion, concurring in part and concurring in the result, filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.
*1320PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Seal-Flex, Inc. appeals the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan1 invalidating United States Patents No. 4,474,833 (the ’833 patent) and No. 4,529,622 (the ’622 patent), both entitled “Method for Constructing All-Weather Surface” and assigned to Seal-Flex. The invalidation was based on the on-sale bar of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Athletic Track and Court Construction…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Graphicdata, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Arthur L. Serrano and Andrew W. Holman v. Telular CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Seal-Flex, Inc. v. Athletic Track and Court Construction, and Owen E. Perry, Sanctioned Party-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.