San Jose Ranch Co. v. Brooks
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order dissolving an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This action was brought to abate an alleged nuisance, to obtain a perpetual injunction for certain purposes, and for one thousand dollars’ damages. The amended complaint was demurred to as not stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and an answer filed at the same time.
A motion was made to dissolve a preliminary injunction which had been granted, and affidavits were filed upon both sides. That motion was submitted to the court upon the amended complaint, answer and demurrer; afterward that tribunal made an order sustaining the demurrer and dissolving the injunction,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blanc v. KlumpkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- O'Brien v. Norwich & Worcester Rail-RoadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
- Seeley v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
- Schulte v. North Pacific Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1875
- Shirley v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cushing - Wetmore Co. v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hargro v. HodgdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Husband v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Fogg v. Nevada-California-Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1890
- Reynolds v. Presidio & Ferries RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.