Reynolds v. Presidio & Ferries Railroad
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
The court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the amended complaint, and thereupon judgment was entered for defendant. Plaintiff prosecutes this appeal from the judgment, and contends that the demurrer was improperly sustained.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff is the owner of a lot sixty feet in depth fronting forty-two feet on the southerly line of Union Street, between Hyde and Larkin streets, in the city of San Francisco; that the franchise of defendant required it to construct and operate its cable railway as nearly as possible in the center of the street, but that, in violation of its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Fisher v. ZumwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- San Francisco Savings Union v. R. G. R. Petroleum & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- O'Brien v. Norwich & Worcester Rail-RoadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
- Siskiyou Lumber & Mercantile Co. v. RostelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meek v. De LatourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Brown v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Donahue v. Stockton Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
- City Store v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.