Legal Opinion
World Wide Meats, Inc. v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided October 2, 1974No. 73-C-3041-WPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McMANUS, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s resisted motion for summary judgment filed August 27,1974.
Plaintiff World Wide Meats, Inc. instituted this action under the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., as the shipper of goods delivered to the defendant railroad for transport in interstate commerce. Specifically, plaintiff seeks recovery under the Carmack Amendment of 1906 to the Act, 49 U.S. C. § 20(11), for damages incurred when a shipment of frozen fabricated beef was rejected as unsatisfactory by the purchaser at its destination, the United States…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen, Local 760Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company v. United States Fo AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spartus Corp. v. The S/S YafoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- The Pillsbury Company v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Ed Miniat, Inc. v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Brockway-Smith Co. v. Boston & Maine Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980
- Oscar Mayer Foods Corp. v. PruittDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.