Snyder v. City of Alameda
California Court of Appeal
1DissentWard, J.
I dissent. The dispute here involves the interpretation- to be given a pension ordinance. The facts are set forth in the majority opinion, including reference to two letters introduced by respondents for the limited purpose of showing the circumstances under which appellant proffered his resignation, namely, that he, a member of the Fire Department, "was at the time “on the carpet” for having reported for duty several times in an intoxicated condition. The fact is not denied that at the time of his resignation charges for dismissal on the ground that for the third time he had reported for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Moreno v. CairnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- MacIntyre v. Retirement Board of SFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Brooks v. Pension BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Douglas v. Pension BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.