Legal Opinion
Shorter v. Tulsa Used Equipment & Industrial Engine Services
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 10, 2006No. 102,280PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 The question presented on certiorari is whether COCA erred when it sustained the three-judge panel’s order that ruled the terms of 85 O.S.2001 § 65.24 (the estoppel act) may not be invoked by claimant in today’s cause. We answer in the affirmative.
I
ANATOMY OF THE LITIGATION
¶2 John Shorter (Shorter or claimant) is sole shareholder of Tulsa Used Equipment and Industrial Engine Services (Tulsa Used Equipment), a Subchapter S corporation engaged in heavy equipment sales and service. National American Insurance Company (NAIC) is Tulsa Used Equipment’s workers’ compensation insurance provider…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Brown v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lincoln Farm, L.L.C. v. OppligerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. SMITHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Waltrip v. Osage Million Dollar Elm CasinoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Marriage of Norrod v. NorrodCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. SMITHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016