Legal Opinion

Roley v. Sammons

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 2005No. 01C-19332; A124116PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, P. J.

Appellant, the decedent’s son and the personal representative of her estate, appeals the “limited judgment” that was entered in this probate proceeding. In that judgment, the trial court ruled that respondent, the decedent’s grandson, is entitled to “take a share of the estate equal to that of [appellant] .” Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the only appealable judgment in a probate proceeding is a judgment of final distribution. For somewhat different reasons, we conclude that the appeal should be dismissed and grant the motion.

The pertinent facts are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. SunderlandOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Goeddertz v. ParchenOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hood River County v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Springer v. GollyhornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Decker v. WimanOregon Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Ebasco Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API