Legal Opinion

Decker v. Wiman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1980No. CA 11167, SC 26360PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This proceeding involves the probate of the estate of Simeon B. Riddle, Jr. Mr. Riddle died leaving few assets but several questions of law regarding the Oregon Probate Code. In the probate proceedings, Tonia Wiman, the respondent herein, was declared sole heir of the decedent’s estate. Later, Tom Decker, claiming to be an heir of the decedent, petitioned the circuit court to reopen the estate and contended that the circuit court’s determination of heirship was invalid. The circuit court denied his petition. The Court of Appeals affirmed, and we granted review.

The facts and procedural history…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Curt's Trucking Co. v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Dixie Meadows Independence Mines Co. v. KightOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Kintigh v. ElliottOregon Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Matter of Estates of CahoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Shriners Hosps. for Children v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Smith v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Roley v. SammonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API