Legal Opinion

State v. Adam

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2002No. 23030PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

MOON, C.J.

Real party in interest-appellant Michael G.M. Ostendorp appeals from the order of the circuit court of the third circuit, the Honorable Ronald Ibarra presiding, ordering Ostendorp to pay, inter alia, jury fees and costs in the amount of $2,460.27 for failing to appear at a jury trial. Ostendorp claims that the circuit court: (1) violated his right to due process by sanctioning him without adequate notice or an opportunity to be heard in a timely manner; (2) abused its discretion in sanctioning him under the Rules of the Circuit Courts of the State of Hawaii…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In the Interest of DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Amantiad v. OdumHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. CastleHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BohannonHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. MundonHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. NaititiHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Torres v. TorresHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. Concerned Citizens of PāloloHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API