Amantiad v. Odum
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
RAMIL, J.
The instant appeal arises from the circuit court’s denial of plaintiff-appellant Michael Amantiad’s Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) Rule 60(b) 1 motion to vacate the circuit court’s August 26,1997 order granting plaintiff-intervenor-appellee Oahu Transit Services, Inc.’s (hereinafter referred to as “OTS”) motion to enforce settlement, after all parties, including defendant-appellee Christopher Odum, stipulated to dismiss the matter with prejudice.
On appeal, Amantiad essentially contends that the circuit court abused its discretion in denying his motion…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Larry McCall Cross-Appellant v. Gayle Franzen, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Franks v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & WrightHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Lingle v. Hawai'i Government Employees Ass'n, AFSCME, Local 152Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- Kaho'ohanohano ex rel. Morales-Kaho'ohanohano v. Department of Human ServicesHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Ka Pa'akai O Ka'Aina v. Land Use CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Matsuura v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- Exotics Hawaii-Kona, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.