Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 22, 2000No. 98-1394PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

A jury convicted the defendant, William G. Martin, of forgery. He appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence, contending that the district court erred in allowing him to represent himself without determining that he made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

In early October 1996, Martin presented a personal check to Harold Shadle upon a long-closed account of a person named Robert Black. The check was made payable to Harold Shadle for $500 and was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. PiperSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  2. State v. TejedaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. State v. LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  4. Hannan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  5. State v. BoggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API