State v. Martin
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
A jury convicted the defendant, William G. Martin, of forgery. He appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence, contending that the district court erred in allowing him to represent himself without determining that he made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We agree and reverse and remand for a new trial.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
In early October 1996, Martin presented a personal check to Harold Shadle upon a long-closed account of a person named Robert Black. The check was made payable to Harold Shadle for $500 and was…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. PiperSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- State v. TejedaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
- Hannan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- State v. BoggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.