Legal Opinion

Hannan v. State

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 25, 2007No. 05-0146PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADY, Justice.

In this case we must decide whether a defendant’s right to counsel under our state and federal constitutions was violated and if counsel’s failure to vindicate those rights resulted in ineffective assistance of counsel. We agree with the defendant that his right to counsel was violated and that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to assert his rights.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

William Hannan was charged with second-degree sexual abuse in violation of Iowa Code section 709.3 (1995). The charge followed his arrest for an incident involving his live-in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Roger B. Ennenga v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. WSH Properties, L.L.C. v. DanielsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  4. State v. SmithermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  5. State v. MottCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2008

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API