State v. Tejeda
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
STREET, Justice.
A jury convicted Edward Tejeda of willful injury for clobbering a young man in the head with a baseball bat. Prior 'to trial, Tejeda sent the court two letters alleging a breakdown in communication with his attorney. Tejeda claims the district court should have inquired into this potential problem. We agree, and hold trial courts have a duty to inquire into alleged breakdowns in communication between defendants and their attorneys. Because the record before us is inadequate for resolution on direct appeal, however, we preserve for postconviction proceedings the issue of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wayne Dale Schell v. Larry Witek, Warden Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of California, 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Gary Allen Lott, United States of America v. Johnny Marton Lott, AKA Johnny Martin LottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- State v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- State of Iowa v. Patrick Michael DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- State of Iowa v. Max v. ThorndikeSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- State v. TateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.