Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Martin v. Wofford

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 13, 1894PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Mandamus. (1) The 8256th section of the Revised Statutes of Missouri [Ed. of 1889], amongst other things, provides •as follows: “andprovided that in cases of appeal and ■on motion for new trial the transcript of ' the evidence ■shall be furnished to the defendant upon the order of the court without cost to the said defendant.’1 (2) 'This transcript must be furnished either by the clerk •or the stenographic reporter.

Read the full summary

Mandamus. (1) The 8256th section of the Revised Statutes of Missouri [Ed. of 1889], amongst other things, provides •as follows: “andprovided that in cases of appeal and ■on motion for new trial the transcript of ' the evidence ■shall be furnished to the defendant upon the order of the court without cost to the said defendant.’1 (2) 'This transcript must be furnished either by the clerk •or the stenographic reporter. (3) The contention that the stenographer was appointed under the act of the general assembly-approved the fifteenth of March, 1887 (R. S. 1889, section 8245), and that said act…

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.

This is a proceeding to obtain a peremptory writ of mandamus against the judge of the criminal court of Jackson county, to require him to make and enforce his order against the official stenographer of his court, to furnish relator, without expense to relator, a full, accurate and complete transcript, in legible English, of all the evidence, including each and all the objections thereto with each and all the rulings of the court thereon, and the exceptions taken to the rulings of said court in the cause wherein the state of Missouri is plaintiff and the relator, Philip Martin, is defendant,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. State ex rel. Lionberger v. TolleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. State ex rel. Reid v. WalbridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. State ex rel. Harris v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  5. Devine v. Board of CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCaffery v. AloeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. Ex parte LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. State ex rel. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co. v. WithrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Dunne v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Varble v. WhitecottonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API