Legal Opinion

Chronakis v. Windsor

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1993No. B059892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

The underlying litigation in this case arises from an automobile accident in which plaintiff sustained personal injuries. The matter was tried to a jury which assessed plaintiff’s comparative fault at 27 percent and awarded her $13,000 in economic damages and $25,000 in noneconomic damages. Plaintiff unsuccessfully sought a new trial based primarily on alleged juror misconduct. We agree the award of economic damages in this case was an improper quotient verdict and reverse that portion of the judgment. The award of noneconomic damages, on the other hand, appears unaffected…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Iwekaogwu v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Fredrics v. PaigeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Lauren H. v. KannappanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Lara v. NevittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Ludwig v. Hacienda Paraiso CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API