Legal Opinion
Lauren H. v. Kannappan
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 2002No. F034098PublishedCited by 5 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DIBIASO, Acting P. J.
Appellant Lauren H. (Lauren), through her guardian ad litem, Renae Romandia, sued respondents Dr. Tillaikarasi Kannappan and San Dimas Medical Group, alleging personal injury, medical malpractice and negligence. Lauren suffered permanent damage as a result of certain conditions and events which occurred during her birth at San Dimas. Kannappan was the physician responsible for Lauren’s delivery.
The trial court granted respondents’ postverdict motion for a new trial on all issues of liability and damages and did not decide appellant’s motion for a new trial on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Duncan v. West Wichita Family Physicians, P.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- Audish v. MaciasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- De La Cruz v. Cal-Pac Sonoma CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Duncan v. Duncan Kitchen Grips, Inc. CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021