Lara v. Nevitt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIMES, J.
Appellant, a long-distance tracker, was the successful plaintiff in a personal injury case arising from a motor vehicle accident but claims there was no substantial evidence to support the jury’s finding that he was 50 percent at fault for failing to wear a safety restraint while asleep in the sleeper berth of the track, and the unjust verdict was the result of (1) instructional error and (2) jury misconduct in rendering a quotient verdict. We find the court did not err in giving an instruction on the seat belt defense, and the jury did not arrive at a chance or quotient…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Covenant Care, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Dixon v. PlunsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Truman v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bay Guardian Co. v. New Times Media LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Birdsall v. HelfetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025