Legal Opinion

Lara v. Nevitt

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 2004No. B172568PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIMES, J.

Appellant, a long-distance tracker, was the successful plaintiff in a personal injury case arising from a motor vehicle accident but claims there was no substantial evidence to support the jury’s finding that he was 50 percent at fault for failing to wear a safety restraint while asleep in the sleeper berth of the track, and the unjust verdict was the result of (1) instructional error and (2) jury misconduct in rendering a quotient verdict. We find the court did not err in giving an instruction on the seat belt defense, and the jury did not arrive at a chance or quotient…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Covenant Care, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Dixon v. PlunsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Truman v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bay Guardian Co. v. New Times Media LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Birdsall v. HelfetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API