Legal Opinion

In Re Toronto

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 31, 1994No. 19-50244PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

ALAN H.W. SHIFF, Bankruptcy Judge.

Sikorsky Federal Credit Union moves to dismiss this chapter 13 case or in the alternative to convert it to a chapter 7 case. Because I conclude that the debtors are ineligible for chapter 13 relief and that conversion to chapter 7 is in the best interests of creditors and the estate, the motion will be granted and this case will be converted to chapter 7.

BACKGROUND

On March 15, 1989, the debtors entered into a home equity line of credit with the movant which was secured by a mortgage on the debtors’ residence. On…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Fleet National Bank v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. In Re De KleinmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. GMAM Investment Funds Trust I v. Globo Comunicacoes E Participacoes S.A. (In Re Globo Comunicacoes E Participacoes S.A.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  4. Carto v. Oakley (In re Oakley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Derrick v. Richard L. Grafe Commodities, Inc. (In Re Derrick)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API