Legal Opinion

Madsen v. Holmes

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1973No. 191PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The following issues are presented by this appeal:

1. Are the findings of fact of the trial court with respect to defendants’ acts of adverse possession against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence?

2. Are the defendants entitled to the disputed parcel of land under a theory of estoppel?

Adverse possession.

Since the defendants are not asserting title founded upon a written instrument or a judgment or any color of title, their assertion of title by adverse possession is controlled by sec. 893.08, Stats., 1 and sec. 893.10 provides that such possession be for a period of at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Thiel v. DamrauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Schneck v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. George J. Meyer Manufacturing Co. v. Howard Brass & Copper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Buza v. WojtalewiczWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allie v. RussoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API