Legal Opinion

Burkhardt v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1962PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The only question is whether the finding of the trial court that the defendant acquired ownership of parcel X8 by adverse possession is contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. Since Smith is not claiming title founded upon a written instrument or a judgment or any color of title, his claim of title by adverse possession must meet the call of sec. 330.10, Stats., which requires adverse possession for twenty years. To sustain such a claim, only the land actually occupied is considered to be held adversely, 1 and by sec. 330.09, Stats., land is deemed to have been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. BilotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Schiro v. Oriental Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Meyer v. HopeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ovig v. MorrisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Ladd v. HildebrantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Roche v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Anderson v. Cold Spring Tungsten, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Bump v. DahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Allie v. RussoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Smith v. HaydenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API