Giles v. Canary
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Sullivan Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, J. —
The appellant, without having demurred to the complaint below, now insists, under a specification in the assignment of errors, that the pleading is bad because it shows on' its face a non-joinder of necessary parties defendants. The objection is not available under the attack here made upon the complaint.
The only question presented by the record is whether the verdict is sustained by the evidence. The appellant claimed that he was the surety on the note sued on, and that this fact Avas knoAvn to the appellant, and he further claimed that the time of payment was extended without…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arnold v. WiltIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Julian v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Maiden v. WebsterIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- Cain v. GodaIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Groves v. StephensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lawrence v. BeecherIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Eichelberger v. Old National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- M. A. Sweeney Co. v. FryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Koontz v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.