Koontz v. Hammond
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Laporte Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.
The appellee sued appellant and the Stevens Store Company, upon a promissory note for $1,000, dated May 25,1883, which said note was signed as follows: “Stevens Store Co. By Samuel Koontz, *77Sr., President. Samuel Koontz, Sr.” The note pro-, vided for interest at eight per cent., payable annually. The complaint was in the statutory form. The Stevens Store Company was defaulted, • and it is not ap-, pearing to this appeal. The appellant challenged the sufficiency of the complaint for want of facts, which demurrer was overruled, and he excepted. He then answered in three paragraphs, as follows:…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Potter v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Hogan v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Dunn v. TouseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Milner v. HylandIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Shewalter v. BergmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- South Chicago City Railway Co. v. ZerlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- MacMillan v. ClementsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Nicholas v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Weidenhammer v. McAdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Sprankle v. BartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900