Cain v. Goda
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Pulaski Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
The appellee recovered a judgment against all the appellants for damages for an assault and battery. Christopher Cain, Sr., appealed, and caused notice of the appeal to be served upon his co-defendants; he then assigned errors in his own name alone, and after joinder in error the cause was submitted on the written agreement of the parties. In such a case, the errors are well enough assigned in the name of Christopher Cain, Sr. Ridenour v. Beekman, 68 Ind. 236.
The error assigned is the overruling of the said Christopher Cain’s motion for a new trial. The reasons for a new trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Coryell v. StoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- City of Aurora v. CobbIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Bowman v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Ridenour v. BeekmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Sparks v. HeritageIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rice v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Pitcher v. DoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Binford v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Richburger v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
- Julian v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.