Commonwealth v. Keita
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.
This appeal, here on further appellate review, requires us to consider whether the evidence warranted a find*844ing that the Commonwealth had met its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was criminally responsible. We conclude that the evidence warranted a finding that the defendant was criminally responsible and that the Appeals Court should not have ordered a directed verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. Commonwealth v. Keita, 45 Mass. App. Ct. 550 (1998).
Additionally, the court has chosen this case as a vehicle to consider whether we should abandon our…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Martin v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Clark v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. Van BellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. McLaughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.