Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Keita

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 29, 1999PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

This appeal, here on further appellate review, requires us to consider whether the evidence warranted a find*844ing that the Commonwealth had met its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was criminally responsible. We conclude that the evidence warranted a finding that the defendant was criminally responsible and that the Appeals Court should not have ordered a directed verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. Commonwealth v. Keita, 45 Mass. App. Ct. 550 (1998).

Additionally, the court has chosen this case as a vehicle to consider whether we should abandon our…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Martin v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Clark v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. Van BellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. McLaughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API