Burgos v. Canino

OPINION

Nazario Burgos, proceeding pro se, filed a civil suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 against numerous officials and employees at the State Correctional Institute at Graterford, where he is a prisoner. He presented claims under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. The District Court, ruling on motions filed by most of the defendants, granted summary judgment on *306each count in favor of all defendants but a defendant named Lieutenant Smith. As the footnote to the District Court’s order reads, “[t]he only remaining defendant is Lieutenant Smith who has…