Legal Opinion
Burgos v. Canino
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 20, 2009No. Civil Action 06-2497PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
In this pro se action, Nazario Burgos, a prisoner in a Pennsylvania correctional institution, brings claims against defendants David DiGuglielmo, Mary Canino, Levi Hosband, Tony Wolfe, CO III Day, CO I Cuddeback, Adriano Carrete, Lieutenant Smith, Scott Davies, Lieutenant M. Doyle, Kyungkuk Cho and Michael B arrata, alleging violations of his constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986. Specifically, the complaint alleges that prison officials retaliated against him because he exercised his constitutional right to file grievances and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- (PC) Penn v. Warden of Kern Valley State PrisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Atkins 742687 v. MyersDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
- BUXTON v. WETZELDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Bradford 891157 v. BostwickDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021
- Bryant 403577 v. WoodgateDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.