Legal Opinion

Kane v. Rudich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 25, 1939PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

A petition has been presented which alleges that respondent has been guilty of such conduct as requires his removal from the office of city magistrate of the city of New York. He has interposed an answer which in effect is a general denial. The petition contains eight charges, which it will serve no useful purpose to set forth in detail. A hearing has been had before this court, at which evidence was adduced in support and refutation of these charges.

We have arrived at a conclusion which makes unnecessary passing judgment separately on each of the several charges.

The Constitution empowers the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Removal From Office of DroegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. In re HardenbrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  3. In re the Application for the Removal from Office of DroegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. In the Matter of MikesellMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Keiser v. BellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Sarisohn v. Appellate Division, Second Department, Supreme Court of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
  5. In re Marín BáezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API