In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.(1) The incidents in the first charge may be placed in three groups: (a) The first group relates to incidents upon" which charges were formulated in disregard of the stenographic minutes and records which conclusively establish the erroneous bases upon which the charges were predicated. Further inquiry into these charges is not needful, (b) The second group of incidents discloses comments and observations made by respondent. The truth with reference to them need not be gone into because if true, and not justifiable, they are not of a sufficiently gross character to sustain the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- In re TigheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- In re the Removal of Deuel from the Office of Justice of the Court of Special SessionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Kane v. RudichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- In re Gallardo DíazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1958
- In re the Answer to the Communication of His Excellency Governor RooseveltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.