Legal Opinion

Emerick v. Chesrown

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 10,767PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

— This was a claim by the appellee against-a decedent’s estate. The claim alleged that in 1867 the appellee delivered to the decedent, then in life, who was the-father-in-law of the appellee, $200, to’ be paid by him to the*48appellee’s creditors, and to be accounted for on demand; that the decedent paid to said creditors $145 of said money, and kept the remaining $55, and .died in May, 1878, without having accounted therefor. The claim demanded $55 and interest, and alleged that the appellant, the decedent’s adminstrator, had refused to pay it on demand.

The administrator answered…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Dodds v. VannoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Trimble v. PollockIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Harris v. RiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Knippenberg v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bailey v. MartzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Walker v. HellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Shearer v. Pla-Boy, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. McNear v. RobersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API