Emerick v. Chesrown
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Noble Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
— This was a claim by the appellee against-a decedent’s estate. The claim alleged that in 1867 the appellee delivered to the decedent, then in life, who was the-father-in-law of the appellee, $200, to’ be paid by him to the*48appellee’s creditors, and to be accounted for on demand; that the decedent paid to said creditors $145 of said money, and kept the remaining $55, and .died in May, 1878, without having accounted therefor. The claim demanded $55 and interest, and alleged that the appellant, the decedent’s adminstrator, had refused to pay it on demand.
The administrator answered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Dodds v. VannoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Trimble v. PollockIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Harris v. RiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Knippenberg v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Bailey v. MartzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Walker v. HellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Shearer v. Pla-Boy, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- McNear v. RobersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.