Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Dike
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 22, 2019No. AC40799PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The plaintiff, Francis Anderson, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Charles Dike, Thomas Ward-McKinley, Steve Lazrove and Heather Madison. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment, (2) denied his motion for a jury trial and (3) denied his motions for the appointment of counsel. We affirm the judgment of the court.
The record reveals the following facts and procedural history. The plaintiff commenced this action in September, 2014, pursuant to the patients' bill of rights,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kakadelis v. DeFabritisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Small v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Gianetti v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF CT.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Small v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Nash v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Viking Construction, Inc. v. 777 Residential, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Raczkowski v. McFarlaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Randolph v. MambrinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Anderson v. DikeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Sen v. TsiongasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019