Legal Opinion

Wieczorek v. City of Franklin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1978No. 75-624PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrahamson, J.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the property owners are entitled to attorney’s fees under sec. 32.05(5), Stats., where the condemnation proceeding is terminated as a result of a defect in the jurisdictional offer. The trial court awarded fees; we reverse, holding that the owners were not entitled to attorney’s fees under sec. 32.05 (5), Stats. 1

There is no dispute as to the facts. On February 28, 1975, the City of Franklin served a jurisdictional offer to purchase a sewer easement across the property ownéd by Victor and Stephania Wieczorek. Pursuant to sec. 32.05(5), Stats., the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Milwaukee County v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Green Bay Packaging, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Martineau v. State Conservation CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. United States v. 4.18 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Idaho County, State of Idaho, and Scott Stanford HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. W.H. Pugh Coal Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  2. Leimert v. McCannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Warehouse II, LLC v. State Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Leathem Smith Lodge, Inc. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Klemm v. American Transmission Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API