Leimert v. McCann
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The primary challenge on this appeal is to the trial judge’s factual finding of twenty years of adverse user and the concomitant conclusion of law that an easement by prescription had thus been established.
However, before reaching this issue, we must first deal with the claim of estoppel by record. The doctrine of estoppel by record prevents a party from litigating again what was actually litigated or might have been litigated in a former action. Closely related is the doctrine of res judicata. This latter doctrine has the effect of making a final adjudication conclusive in a subsequent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Werner v. RiemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Cohan v. Associated Fur Farms, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Mayer v. GrueberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Shellow v. HagenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Peabody Seating Co. v. Jim Cullen, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- DePratt v. West Bend Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Landess v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Klaus v. Vander HeydenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Donald W. Pelfresne v. Village of Williams BayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Barbian v. Lindner Bros. Trucking Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.