Legal Opinion
Bell-Wayland Co. v. Russell Jobbers Mills
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 25, 1923No. 11848PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, C.
This is an appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of Oklahoma county, rendered on tbe 7th day of May, 1920, denying plaintiff damages for alleged breach of contract. Tbe contract was as follows;
“Tbe Russell Jobbers Mills, Manufacturers of Grocers Sundries.
“Rusdun Peanut Butter and Specialties, “Oklahoma 'City, Oklahoma,
“Nov. 1, 1916.
“Memorandum of Purchase and Sale.
"The Russell Jobbers’ Mills, of Oklahoma City, Okla., sells to Bell Wayland Co., of Oklahoma City, buys their requirements of vinegar for the year 1917, as follows: 3 to C minimum cars, at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marx v. American Malting Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Smoot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- National Pub. Co. v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. BealesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Staver Carriage Co. v. Park Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by5 opinions
- Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Hensley v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron Works v. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron Works v. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005