Legal Opinion

Bell-Wayland Co. v. Russell Jobbers Mills

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1923No. 11848PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment of tbe district court of Oklahoma county, rendered on tbe 7th day of May, 1920, denying plaintiff damages for alleged breach of contract. Tbe contract was as follows;

“Tbe Russell Jobbers Mills, Manufacturers of Grocers Sundries.
“Rusdun Peanut Butter and Specialties, “Oklahoma 'City, Oklahoma,
“Nov. 1, 1916.
“Memorandum of Purchase and Sale.
"The Russell Jobbers’ Mills, of Oklahoma City, Okla., sells to Bell Wayland Co., of Oklahoma City, buys their requirements of vinegar for the year 1917, as follows: 3 to C minimum cars, at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marx v. American Malting Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  2. Smoot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. National Pub. Co. v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  4. Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. BealesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Staver Carriage Co. v. Park Steel Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Hensley v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron Works v. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron Works v. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API