Marx v. American Malting Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.
This is an action brought by the defendant in error, which was plaintiff below and will be so designated in this opinion, against the plaintiff in error, to be designated “the defendant,” to recover the price and value of a quantity of malt alleged to have been sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant at a certain stated price per bushel. The defendant, admitting his liability upon the cause of action stated in the declaration, nevertheless set up a counterclaim arising from a breach by the plaintiff of the stipulations of the contract under which the malt…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Nash v. TowneSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Runkle v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Bell v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Loudenback Fertilizer Co. v. Tennessee Phosphate Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. O'KELLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Shader Contractors, Inc. And Citizens National Bank of Orlando, Assignee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- McBain v. PrattAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Cohen v. Clayton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.