Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Beales
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an action for the alleged breach of a written contract made by defendants with plaintiff’s assignors, whereby the former agreed to dry certain apricots and to sell and deliver to plaintiff’s assignors the dried fruit. Judgment passed for defendants and plaintiff appeals.
The contract, executed on April 7, 1919, was prepared by plaintiff’s assignors, whom we shall designate as the “buyers.” It seems to have been made by filling in the spaces in a printed blank form of contract adapted for use in buying fruit from fruit-growers, although defendants, the sellers, were not growers of fruit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Low v. PewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Marx v. American Malting Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Inman Bros. v. Dudley & Daniels Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
- Bautovich v. Great Southern Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Laack v. DimmickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Mathieson Alkali Works v. Virginia Banner Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Scott v. Sun-Maid Raisin Growers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- East Coast Oil Co., S. A. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Pray v. Trower Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.