Legal Opinion

N. S. Sherman MacHine & Iron Works v. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 13, 1924No. 13151PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This suit was instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county by appellee, plaintiff in the lower court, against the appellant, defendant below, to recover the sum of .$2,363.90 with interest, balance due for material furnished the defendant. To the petition of plaintiff the defendant filed its answer and denied that it was indebted to the plaintiff in the amount claimed. The basis of this action was a written contract between the plaintiff and the defendant. The material parts of which are as follows:

“That for and in consideration of the mutual promises hereinafter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Thurber v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. Bell-Wayland Co. v. Russell Jobbers MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. M. W. Kellogg Co. v. Standard Steel Fabricating Co. Standard Steel Fabricating Co. v. M. W. Kellogg Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  2. M. W. Kellogg Co. v. Standard Steel Fabricating Co. Standard Steel Fabricating Co. v. M. W. Kellogg Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API