State v. Gibbs
Supreme Court of Minnesota
■ Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis of selling intoxicating liquor without a license. From the judgment and sentence imposed by the court, Charles L. Smith, J., and from an order refusing to dismiss the action, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggakd, J.
Defendant was convicted of selling liquor without a license. This appeal was taken- from the judgment entered and. the sentence- imposed by the court, and from its refusal to dismiss said action and charge and-complaint made against defendant.
The first proposition argued for defendant is that the state did not present proof sufficient to warrant a conviction of the charge that defendant sold beer or malt, which was a fermented and an intoxicating liquor. The objection is that “the state offered proof only that the substance sold was beer, without more.”
The record shows that about midnight two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Andrews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Saunders v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- People v. McCordMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- State v. BadenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Gardner v. ConwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Guthrie v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
- State v. JenkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Leigh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.