People v. McCord
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Iosco. (Simpson, J.) Respondent was convicted of statutory burglary. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion. '
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Respondent was charged with the offense of breaking and entering by night into the store of Richards, Hubbell & Co., of Baldwin township, Iosco county, with intent to commit larceny, and was convicted. There was testimony indicating without doubt that he entered the store in question with the intention of stealing. There was also testimony tending to deny the criminal quality of what he did, both on the ground of drunkenness, and that of being led to enter the premises while more or less intoxicated, by some one else, whose act would exonerate him.
Some of the prominent facts require to be…
2Cited by27 opinions
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- People v. SinclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Woo Wai v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- People v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.