Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Conway

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 6, 1951No. 35,317PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

This action, to have the defendant perpetually enjoined from further engaging in the unauthorized practice of law and to have him adjudged in contempt of court therefor, was brought by the plaintiffs 2 in their own behalf as licensed lawyers and in a representative capacity in behalf of every other licensed lawyer in Minnesota, as well as in behalf of the courts and the public. 3

Defendant, who is possessed of only a grade-school education, has never been admitted to the practice of law in Minnesota or…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Peoples Stock Yards State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. R.I. Bar Asso. v. Auto. Service Asso.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. New Jersey State Bar Ass'n v. Northern New Jersey Mortgage AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. R. J. Edwards, Inc. v. HertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. ButterfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API