Legal Opinion

In the Interest of K.L.O-V.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 2006No. 05CA2214PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROMÁN.

In this paternity action, M.F.O., the paternal grandmother (grandmother), appeals from a district court judgment affirming a magistrate’s order denying her motion to intervene. We affirm the judgment in part and dismiss the appeal in part.

In March 2005, K.A.Y. (mother) filed a paternity action seeking determination of a parent-child legal relationship between M.N.O. (father) and her child, K.L.O-V., and entry of orders regarding child support, parental responsibilities, and parenting time. Father acknowledged paternity and, like mother, sought entry of orders regarding…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. C.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. In Re Adoption of CaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. People Ex Rel. K.L-P.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Feigin v. Alexa Group, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Roosevelt v. Beau Monde Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re KloColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Mauro v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API