Legal Opinion

In Re Klo

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 2006No. 05CA2214Published

1Opinion of the Court

151 P.3d 637 (2006)

In the Interest of K.L.O-V., a Child, and Concerning K.A.V., Petitioner-Appellee, and

M.F.O., Grandparent, Intervenor-Appellant.

No. 05CA2214.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV.

November 16, 2006.

Law Office of Laura E. Shapiro, P.C., Laura E. Shapiro, Kris D. Ward, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner-Appellee.

Rotole, Rotole, Blanchard & Lumbye, L.L.C., Richard J. Rotole, Denver, Colorado, for Intervenor-Appellant.

Opinion by Judge ROMÁN.

In this paternity action, M.F.O., the paternal grandmother (grandmother), appeals from a district court judgment affirming a magistrate's order…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. C.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. In Re Adoption of CaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. People Ex Rel. K.L-P.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Feigin v. Alexa Group, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Roosevelt v. Beau Monde Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API