Legal Opinion
Mauro v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 1, 2013No. Court of Appeals No. 12CA1509Published
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by JUDGE LOEB
*497¶ 1 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) appeals from the district court's order denying its motion to intervene in this personal injury action filed by plaintiffs, Maranda G. Mauro, by and through her father, Walter J. Mauro, Jr., and Walter J. Mauro, Jr. individually. We reverse and remand with directions.
I. Procedural History and Background
¶ 2 In 2009, Maranda Mauro was a passenger in a vehicle owned by S.O. B.C. was driving the vehicle when he caused an accident and Ms. Mauro was injured. On her behalf, Ms. Mauro's father filed a complaint…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United Nuclear Corporation v. Cranford Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Rohrbough v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Meyer Goldberg, Inc. v. Fisher Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.