Feigin v. Alexa Group, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
We granted certiorari to determine whether the court of appeals erred in applying a de novo standard of review, in allowing the Investors to intervene, and whether, by doing so, it improperly created a fiduciary or agency relationship between the Colorado Securities Commissioner (the "Commissioner") and the Investors in enforcement proceedings under section 11-51-602, 3 C.R.S. (2000). We now hold that a de novo standard of review is appropriate when reviewing a trial court's denial of a motion to intervene under CRCP. 24(a). We further hold that the Investors had a valid interest in the civil…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees, Nathaniel McQueen Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Ceres Gulf and Esis/ina v. Cleaster Cooper, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (u.s. Department of Labor), Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- E-470 Public Highway Authority v. 455 Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Prudential Securities Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Harvey Fertilizer & Gas Co. v. Pitt CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- People ex rel. O.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Cherokee Metropolitan District v. Meridian Service Metropolitan DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Moreland v. AlpertColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- CF & I Steel, L.P. v. Air Pollution Control DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.