Fortman v. Dayton Power & Light Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs, Walter V. Bergman, Executor, and Dolores Fortman, Administratrix (referred to collectively as “Bergman”), appeal from a summary judgment rendered in favor of defendant-appellee, Dayton Power & Light Company (“DP & L”), in these consolidated wrongful death actions. Kurt Bergman was electrocuted and Tim Fortman was severely injured when a metal scraper that Kurt Bergman intended to use to clean a smokestack touched uninsulated high-voltage electrical wires strung over the roof. The trial court held that ownership of the power lines was determinative of the duty…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Keister v. Park Centre LanesOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Otte v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Hetrick v. Marion-Reserve Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- Fryberger v. Lake Cable Recreation Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Kohli v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wyrulec Co. v. SchuttWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Conte v. General Housewares Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Everhart v. Coshocton Cty. Mem. Hosp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
- Grabill v. Worthington Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Parke v. Ohio Edison, Unpublished Decision (11-18-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.