Fryberger v. Lake Cable Recreation Ass'n
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.
A motion for summary judgment should be granted when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party, is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Summary judgment should not be granted unless it appears from the evidence that reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the party against whom the motion is made. In reviewing a motion for summary judgment, the inferences to be drawn from the underlying facts are viewed in the light most favorable to the opposing party. Civ. R. 56(C); Wills v. Frank Hoover Supply (1986), 26 Ohio St.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Wills v. Frank Hoover SupplyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Cooper v. RooseOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Berkowitz v. WinstonOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- Mitchell v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Miller v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Keeton v. Telemedia Co. of Southern OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Monnin v. Fifth Third Bank of Miami ValleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. TablackOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Ramos v. KhawliOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.