Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Huynh v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1996No. G018874PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WALLIN, J.

Tri Huu Huynh petitions for a writ of mandate/prohibition, contending the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion pursuant to Penal Code section 995 1 on the ground it could not be used to set aside allegations the charged attempted murders were premeditated and deliberated. We grant the petition.

Huynh was charged by complaint in the municipal court with shooting at an occupied motor vehicle and assault with a firearm. The evidence at the preliminary hearing showed he was a passenger in a Honda driven by Tuan Nguyen. Hieu Vu and Tran (a minor) were passengers.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. Superior Court (Mendella)California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Ramos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Burnett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SaezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Salazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Thompson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
  5. People v. McGowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API