Legal Opinion

People v. McGowan

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided March 27, 2015No. BR051696PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KUMAR, J.

Penal Code section 991 is the legislative safeguard that allows an in-custody misdemeanant to require the arraigning magistrate to determine whether there is probable cause to believe the defendant has committed a *Supp. 3public offense. (Pen. Code, § 991, subd. (a).) If the magistrate finds no such probable cause, the defendant is entitled to a dismissal of the complaint. (Id., subd. (d).)1

The issue presented is whether section 991 vests the trial court with the discretion to dismiss only some of the charged offenses due to the absence of probable cause, thereby allowing the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. Superior Court (Mendella)California Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Ghent v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. McGowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. BarajasCalifornia Superior Court · 2018
  3. People v. BarajasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. People v. McGowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. McGowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API