In re Kelly
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Books and records of a union are under a “forthwith” grand jury subpoena duces tecum. The subpoena covers all records over a six-year period. A subpoena duces tecum, unlike a search warrant, does not serve to disturb possession of property.1 Notwithstanding, no officer of petitioner-union would be entitled to be present while the grand jury was in actual session and then considering or examining the records and documents which had been produced pursuant to the subpoena.2 It would involve an unnecessary and unwarranted waste of time were the grand jury required to sit…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- In re Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Baim & Blank, Inc. v. Bruno-New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- In re American Sugar Refining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1910
3Cited by12 opinions
- Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Director of Internal RevenueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- United States v. BirrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- United States v. Kleen Laundry & Cleaners, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
- In re Grand Jury Investigation William H. Pflaumer & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- In Re P. I. Nwamu & P. I. Nwamu Associates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.