Baim & Blank, Inc. v. Bruno-New York, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek a protective order pursuant to Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., enjoining the defendant and its representatives from disclosing or publishing information discovered under Rule 34. The plaintiffs heretofore consented to a motion made by the defendant for the order of discovery and inspection. They have made available for examination by the defendant’s representative, a certified public accountant, various books and records, including profit and loss statements and corporate income tax returns. There appears to have been…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Reeves v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Connecticut Importing Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1940
- Tollefsen v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
- The SultanaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. United Fruit Company, Standard Fruit and Steamship CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- GAF Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- State ex rel. Boswell v. CurtisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Carr v. Monroe Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Cooper v. Hallgarten & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.